The Team

Navigating the New Landscape: Understanding the Ban on Strike-Breaking Agency Staff
Navigating the New Landscape: Understanding the Ban on Strike-Breaking Agency Staff

In a landmark decision impacting the labour landscape in the UK, a recent legal challenge led by 13 trade unions has rendered it illegal for employers to employ agency staff to substitute for striking workers. This move marks a significant shift in the dynamics between employers, employees, and trade unions.

The Legal Journey

The dispute centres around the UK government's decision in July 2022 to remove legal barriers preventing employers from using agency workers during strikes. The unions challenged this on two grounds: the lack of government consultation and a potential breach of Article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The High Court upheld the first ground, citing the government's rapid policy change without adequate consultation or robust data to support its decision.

Current Implications and Future Prospects

As of 10 August 2023, the ruling prohibits employment businesses from providing temporary workers to cover roles of striking employees. This reinstates the pre-July 2022 status quo and prompts employers to explore alternative strategies for managing industrial action. Options include reallocating existing staff or continuing with the original roles of pre-strike agency workers. This development may have broader ramifications on other governmental labour policies, with trade unions likely to challenge laws that undermine strike actions or worker protections.

Practical Considerations for Employers

Employers must now navigate these changes with care. While some might not see a significant operational impact, they must remain mindful of health and safety obligations and the potential for exacerbating industrial disputes. The ability to adapt to these new legal constraints will be crucial for maintaining workforce relations and ensuring compliance.

A Balancing Act This ruling represents a balance between the rights of workers and the operational needs of employers. With the legal landscape in flux, both employers and employees must stay informed and adaptable to navigate these changes effectively.

Case Citation: Unison and others v The Secretary of State for Business and Trade [2023] EWHC 1781 (Admin)